Arguments over Churchill, whether between a David Horowitz type and an academic or between those within academia who see a witch-hunt and those who see simply a cad [sic] brought to rights, have been going on for well more than a year, now [sic]. Indeed, though his guilt or innocence should not be the point of the broader discussion (few of us are really in a position to judge), there are those on all sides who try to make Churchill and his presumed guilt or innocence an emblem for their greater argument about academia.Few of us are in a position to judge.
Monday, July 23, 2007
Lots of volunteers
Weird, fake-even-handed piece on Ward Churchill by some gink named Aaron Barlow at some funhouse called ePluribus Media: